Research and Scholarship

Improving Practice in a Head and Neck Oncology Clinic Using the PRO-CTCAE Tool

Rose Ann Ruddy,(1) DNP, MSN, RN, ACNP-BC, Brigit Carter,(2) PhD, RN, CCRN, FAAN, Maryanne Giuliante,(1) DNP, MBA, RN, GNP, ANP-C, NEA-BC, HEC-C, and AnnMarie Lee Walton,(2) PhD, RN, MPH, OCN®, CHES, FAAN

From (1)Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Montvale, New Jersey; (2)Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina

Authors’ disclosures of conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.

Correspondence to: Rose Ann Ruddy, DNP, MSN, RN, ACNP-BC, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 225 Summit Ave, Montvale, NJ 07645 E-mail: ruddyrn@aol.com


J Adv Pract Oncol 2024;15(5):303–310 | https://doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.5.2 | © 2024 BroadcastMed LLC


  

ABSTRACT

Background: Patients with head and neck cancer undergoing treatment report many side effects. Using patient-reported outcomes can assist with care management. Objectives: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to implement the patient-reported outcome version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) measurement system, reduce patient hydration visits, and measure provider satisfaction with the PRO-CTCAE survey. Methods: Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS software. Descriptive statistics for means were used to summarize the data for survey completion rate and for the provider satisfaction questionnaire. A Fisher’s exact test was used to compare hydration visits before and after implementation of the PRO-CTCAE survey. Findings: The PRO-CTCAE surveys had a response rate of 91.2% (323/354) when telehealth visits were omitted. Hydration in the presurvey group was 23.5% (150/637) and in the postsurvey group was 38.5% (165/429), a 15% absolute percentage increase (Fisher’s exact p < .001). Among providers, the positive response rate was 100% for five questions and 88.9% for two questions. Implications: The PRO-CTCAE survey allowed the patient to report their symptoms prior to discussing them with their provider. Providers were able to expedite symptom management and get information to patients in a timely manner. The PRO-CTCAE survey should be considered a part of a multidisciplinary approach to caring for patients.




For access to the full length article, please sign in.

Section Seperator
ADVERTISEMENT
Section Seperator
ADVERTISEMENT
Section Seperator
ADVERTISEMENT
Section Seperator
Copyright © 2010-2023 Harborside Press, LLC All rights reserved.               
Home | Current Issue | Previous Issue | Submissions | About JADPRO | Advertising | Privacy Policy | Contact | Copyright Notice/Disclaimer | Subscribe
Bot trap - Don't go here
By continuing to browse this site you permit us and our partners to place identification cookies on your browser and agree to our use of cookies to identify you for marketing. Read our Privacy Policy to learn more.